“I’m going to make sure that the rest of their life is ruined, that when they’re 8 years old, they throw up; when they’re 12 years old, they won’t sleep; when they’re 19 years old, they’ll have nightmares and they’ll never have a relationship with anybody.”

Lawyers are scum. This one makes the typical scum look halfway respectable. Fagan should be disbarred for such behavior and made to beg on the street.

Of course we must bear in mind that Fagan would not do the same if the child on the witness stand were his daughter, niece, or the child of a close friend.

Over the past month or so, I have had several people write me and giving me a better idea of who Chuck is. As much as I have come to know of him, nothing connected the dots  like a recent article from the MidCounty Memo he has linked to on his blog.

The article relates an event from Currie’s youth:

The director of homeless shelter Baloney Joe’s had spoken to
Currie’s class a year earlier, recruiting student volunteers. Though Currie had pledged to
aid, he had not followed through.

When the returning director asked students if they knew why poverty and homelessness
had increased since his last visit, he raised his finger across the crowd at Currie and said,
“Because people like that don’t keep their commitments to help.” The guilt drove Currie to
volunteer that weekend. He would stay for four years.

The typical American is quite generous. Not only does he or she consent to having both state and federal income taxes taken from their paychecks every pay period, they continue to pour money into the sieve that is the Social Security system.

Yet here we see the director of Baloney Joe’s emotionally beating up on a young Chuck Currie as if the high schooler had anything to do with the fact that there are a lot of lazy people in Oregon who refuse to take responsibility over their lives.

This is how the liberal religious left machine works. It is no different from many elements in the religious right- it uses guilt and shame to effect its ends. The right at least is a bit more honest with regard to their methodologies.

Knowing a bit more about what brought Chuck to have the positions he has today makes me have genuine sympathy for him. By all accounts he is a passionate, dedicated individual who cares about helping others. Unfortunately, there were undue influences in his life that caused him to take a detour.

Case in point, individuals like Jan Kruska who advocate for sexual predators on their websites. Kruska, also known as Amanda Rogers is a registered sex offender from Glendale, Arizona. She believes it is Mark Lundsford’s fault that a man kidnapped, raped, and murdered his daughter Jessica Lundsford. In her spare time she signs up for MySpace accounts stating that she is 16 years old.

Another miserable specimen is Shirley Lowery of Springtown Texas. She took of the mantle of RSO advocacy when her son was convicted for raping his daughter. Among her more notable quotables, we find,

I believe that Mark Lunsford killed this child and Couey watched him bury her

Jesus was a pedophile although his actions were not illegal at the time. Laws have changed but it is not likely that God has changed what He considers to be a sin. He got it right the first time.

Child porn is a puzzler, Sending people to prison for something they see in their own home seems un-American.

It should be as apparent that this woman is a deranged hag to even the least enlightened among the public.

My final exhibit is Jim Freeman, another activist who will be doing a lot less activism once he is convicted of possessing child pornography. Over 400,000 images of children being drugged, raped, and molested in all. Incidentally, this man lobbied for less restrictive laws in dealing with convicted sexual offenders.

When it comes to depravity, these people are archtypical of the cancer that pervades our society. In time, I hope we will see laws that will deal specifically with people such as Shirley Lowery, Jan Kruska, Crysta, and their little band of perverts. Not only do they pose a danger to children, either directly or indirectly, but they offend what once used to be the prevailing mores in our society. No prison sentence can ever be harsh enough to adequately punish them and even the swiftest execution at the hands of the State would scarcely avenge the enormous crimes they have either commited or abetted.

With that in mind, as well as the fact that they openly ridicule victims and victims’ families, they deserve every bit of the ridicule and scorn they receive. Base in their carnal pursuits, they along with the pedophiles they defend deserve the utmost contempt.

It’s amusing to see these bozos all bent out of shape when someone makes fun of them, especially when they have done similiar numbers on other people. Angry Black Woman is especially himlarious when she gets mad. I just hope she realizes most bloggers see her as a farce.

King is also a Senator of the campus SGA. This governing body has failed to take action. What follows is my letter to Claire Smith, a fellow Senator of the SGA:

Dear Ms. Smith,

 

I viewed the YouTube video of Roderick King’s vandalism of a pro-life display at the UofW. I also read your asinine response to Jill Stanek. King’s behavior is typical of abortion rights zealots who wish to deprive those who disagree with them the right to speak their mind. Two years ago there was a similiar incident here in Greater Cincinnati where Professor Sally Jacobsen of Northern Kentucky University took part in and encouraged a similiar act of vandalism with several of her graduate level students against a pro-life display.

 

While King’s actions were certainly deplorable AND illegal, your organization’s total inaction really makes one wonder what values the SGA holds dear. In any case, it is evident that any attempt by pro-abortion advocates to paint themselves as the more reasonable party in the abortion debate is pretty much a guaranteed failure. Not only did Mr. King behave irrationally and illegally in violating the Constitutional rights of the UofW pro-life organization, the leadership of the SGA failed to enforce any standards of conduct for its members. Evidently, you are an anarchist ma’am as your organization’s failure to enforce any rules of conduct is an explicit endorsement of anarchy.

 

Roderick King’s destruction of property, which indeed IS an act of violence, demonstrates the fact that abortionists and those willingly soliciting their services are indeed violent people. This is a fact and it is in no way ameliorated by any technicality your organization or any other can either produce, fabricate, or imagine.

 

Please note that I reserve the right to publish any response you choose to make to this email on my blog at http://366mhz.wordpress.com.

 

Regards,

 

KF

Dawn @ 366 Mhz

I just discovered this web site during a Google search. From the lack of comments and traffic it would appear you do not receive regular visitors.

It depends on what I post on. My Jeremiah Wright posts got quite a bit of hits. I don’t really promote this site as its a hobby.

You seem somewhat obsessed with my activities. Attacking my very public views while hiding behind a screen name is just as dishonorable as a Klan member covered with their hood. Try taking responsibility for your own views. Yes, there are risks when you engage in public life. But for democracy to thrive we need all of our citizens to become involved with the process in honest ways.

I must congratulate you Chuck. You wrote several complete sentences before making a comparison of my blog to the Ku Klux Klan. For the record, I do not condone, support, or believe in racial bigotry and while my views are ultra-conservative, they do not involve the types of activities the Klan has historically taken part in. While you may feel that the scorn and mockery I give your views are as bad as a lynching, there are plenty of victims of the Ku Klux Klan who would see your comparison as petty and facile.

As for my anonymity, this is explained on my about page. To clarify, I do not want my views to adversely reflect upon my employeer(s), coworkers, friends, family, religious/technical affiliations, and so forth. Believe it or not, I don’t eat puppies, don’t burn Barak Obama in effigy, or go out on Saturday nights and go gay bashing. I like to do normal things and have normal interests, including family. I’d rather not have my wife known as “the lady married to the crazy guy who writes for Dawn @ 366 Mhz.” While I don’t mind the attention, I’m sure she might.

We do not need to use our voices to tear down other people – as you seem to do here – but rather we need all of us involved in an effort to build up the common good. Your anger comes up clearly but I would encourage you to come out the dark place you know find yourself, be open about who you are, and see if the sunlight doesn’t change your views – maybe soften to your heart. In the meantime, I will pray again tonight that all Earth’s people become reconciled to God and to one another. – Rev. Chuck Currie

I truly appreciate your sentiments and I believe you mean well. This blog however is meant to piss people off. It is meant to make people angry about our border insecurity, illegal immigrants taking advantadge of the generosity of the American taxpayer, that since 1973, over 45,000,000 children were deprived of the right to see the light of day, and so on.

I realize you share none of my views and I don’t write this blog to convince you. You will never change my mind and I do not expect to change yours. You and I share one common trait- we are both persuaded in our views to the point we will most likely never change. Our views of justice, peace, prosperity, and the public good, different as they may be, are pretty much set in stone. As weird as I think many of your ideals are, I at least respect that you have them and can state them eloquently.

Maybe one day when I feel this blog has achieved my aims, humble as they may be, I will be able to engage you more constructively in dialogue. I doubt that you have an arcane lab in your basement where you dissect live children and animals and you and I probably have some common interest somewhere (besides blogging and pushing our social agendas)

So yeah, you are a weirdo liberal dude who I will always consider a weirdo liberal dude, but thats cool. In the deep recesses of your mind you see me as an aberration and thats okay. It’s a free country and you can think as you please, even though your man is going to get creamed in November’s election.

Thank you Barak. Thank you for making it clear you are an elitist jerk. McCain can bark like a seal in November and still kick your ass.

First let’s be clear on something. The Constitution guarantees the right of religious people to practice and exercise their faith without fear of intimidation, violence, or criminal penalty. Jeremiah Wright has been afforded this same protection and he has been allowed through the magnanimity of the US Government to call down hellfire and brimstone on the same unimpeded.

Even though the Constitution grants Wright the ability to mouth off like a moron, it does not protect him from the opinions of those who think he is a rabble-rouser who forgot when the Sixties ended. I’m free to say I think Wright is an idiot and belongs in an asylum and Hillary Clinton is free to say whatever she believes about him. (She’s been rather charitable if you ask me.)

 Just because you are a person of the cloth and the Constitution protects the exercise of your religion doesn’t mean you can act like a dumbass and people somehow have to pretend every word that proceeds out of your mouth is golden. I’m sure if John McCain’s pastor had been Fred Phelps, the people defending Obama would have attacked McCain and burned him in effigy. (And rightfully so)